JOHN SUMSER,
S P O N S O R S Find out more
Hall Of FameTypes
of Links
The advertising industry is on the verge of being shattered into a thousand fragments due to the knowledge explosion and the proliferation of new technologies. There are no more grand theories that hold sway over the entire industry. Michael Strangelove
Advertising is
Reality
The System
It's better to
All material on this
|
... | Back to 1st Steps Back to Archives We've captured this press release for posterity's sake. IBN and the Virtual Magistrate Project have absolutely no relationship with each other. The press release is simply reference material for an article in 1st Steps: Marketing and Design Daily dated 5-22-96 http://vmag.law.vill.edu:8080 PRESS RELEASE
Tuesday, May 21, 1996 Virtual Magistrate Issues Its First Decision
Recommends that AOL Remove a Subscriber Message The Virtual Magistrate Project is an Internet-based arbitration service that assists in the rapid, initial resolution of computer network disputes. The Project opened for business in March 1996. The basic decision offered by the Virtual Magistrate is whether a network message, file, or posting and should be taken down or left in view. The case name is "Tierney and Email America", VM Docket No. 96-0001 (08 May 1996). The date of the decision is May 20, 1996. The full text and related materials and correspondence are available for public inspection through the Virtual Magistrate Home Page at <http://vmag.law.vill.edu:8080>. The complainant in the case is James Tierney who is a member of America Online and is affiliated with the Virtual Magistrate Project as a advisor on consumer fraud issues. Tierney is also a former Attorney General for the State of Maine. His complaint was directed against Email America, which had posted a message on AOL offering to sell lists of as many as twenty million email addresses. The complaint alleged that Email America's message was an invasion of privacy, against sound public policy, and deceptive. Tierney characterized Email America's offering as promoting spamming or junk e-mail. These terms describe indiscriminate, bulk, direct mail marketing via email. America Online voluntarily participated in the case. The AOL submission pointed out that its terms of service agreement permits the removal of messages that are harmful or offensive or otherwise in violation of AOL rules. AOL also stated that it does not encourage indiscriminate, unsolicited bulk mail on its system. AOL considers such mailings inconsistent with Internet custom and practice, an impediment to service, and potentially deleterious to its system. Unsolicited bulk mail has also been the subject of numerous complaints from AOL subscribers. The Virtual Magistrate ruled that the determination of what constitute harmful or offensive activity can take into account the limitations of the AOL system, Internet custom and practice, and customer complaints. The Magistrate determined that removal or blocking of the message in question would be permissible under the AOL Terms of Service Agreement and that AOL should remove the message from its system. The case was decided by N. M. Norton, Jr., a partner with the law firm of Wright, Lindsey & Jennings in Little Rock, Arkansas. Mr. Norton was recently a member of the U.S. National Information Infrastructure Advisory Council. He is one of eight individuals selected so far to serve as Virtual Magistrates. The Virtual Magistrate Project is an experimental service developed by the Cyberspace Law Institute, and funded by the National Center for Automated Information Research. Operational elements of the Project are provided by the American Arbitration Association and the Villanova Center for Information Law and Policy. Documents explaining the rules, procedures, and purpose of the Project are available on the Virtual Magistrate Home Page. Virtual Magistrate Executive Director Robert Gellman said "The Virtual Magistrate Project is off to a good start with this decision. We expect the Project to demonstrate how computer networks can police themselves. The decision supports the right of system operators to establish appropriate rules governing their services. We were disappointed that Email America did not respond to repeated requests to participate in this case. But since there was an active complaint and a participating system operator, we proceeded with the case." For additional information, contact:
Take a look at the Archives. We've indexed all the past issues with topic pointers. It should make the historical material somewhat easier to get through.
All material on this site is © 1995, 1996 by IBN (The Internet Business Network), Mill Valley, CA 94941 |