Guest Column:NETWORKING - THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO CONDUCT A JOB SEARCH
by Paul T. Forde
TERMINATION. The word itself has different meanings depending on
the context. In the situation where it is used to describe the
end of one's employment, there is but one interpretation; he or
she will be unemployed and finding a new job will not be easy.
With a larger percentage of corporations in America undergoing
reorganization or "downsizing", a greater number of employees,
including engineers and scientists, will see themselves in this
unfortunate position. Furthermore, once the initial shock of
"termination" wears off, it is often replaced with a feeling
of panic; how do I find a new job? Relax. There is a very
effective method that can be used to conduct a successful job
search. It is known as NETWORKING. If used effectively,
networking can be a rewarding experience which will often result
in a better position in terms of job satisfaction and salary.
Where does one begin? First and foremost, it is important to
understand what networking is all about. For many people in
the technical community it involves an entirely new or different
philosophy for conducting a job search. It means researching a
company to determine if that firm would have interest in your
background. It means contacting a knowledgeable person who may
be aware of opportunities, and finally, it involves speaking to
that person with the primary intention of obtaining advice.
This is one of the key points pertaining to networking; you are
contacting a perspective employer not for a job, but for advice.
By writing that person, you are telling him or her that you value
their opinion and you are requesting their advice in seeking
companies which may have interest in your background.
In the last few years I have had the opportunity to speak with
many engineers who have undertaken a job search (both
employed and unemployed). In most cases, when asked how they
planned to undertake their job search, the response I
received often sounded something like this: "check the newspapers,
respond to ads and contact recruiters". Six months later,
when their job search was stalled and a feeling of
hopelessness had set in, they realized that something was
drastically wrong.
A recent study conducted by the American Society for Metals
(ASM) revealed that the majority of technical jobs are placed
through "referrals". It is my firm belief that this is not only
true, but furthermore, answering advertisements and working
through recruiters are the least effective ways of finding a
job. I am not recommending that a job seeker neglect advertisements
or avoid recruiters. What I am saying is that networking is your
best opportunity for finding a job, and by relying on the
aforementioned or most common methods, you can expect minimal
results. Perhaps the following will offer further clarification.
Assume you see an advertisement in your local Sunday paper
for a position which you consider to be applicable to your
expertise and interests. You respond with a cover letter and
attach a copy of your resume.
Consider the following scenario at the company which placed the
ad. The person responsible for opening the resumes may be a
secretary or receptionist. Assume this person has been given
guidelines and instructed to make three piles; yes, no, and
maybe. The following profile describes the number of resumes
received on a particular day:
Day 1 - 15 resumes
Day 2 - 25 resumes
Day 3 - 50 resumes
Day 4 - 35 resumes
Day 5 - 25 resumes
Over a five day period 140 resumes are received. Suppose your
resume arrives on Day 3. What are the chances that your
correspondence will end up in the "yes" or "maybe" pile.
Consider another scenario. The person responsible for screening
waits five days before beginning to review 140 resumes. Suppose
your resume is somewhere near the bottom of the pile. How would you
rate your chances under these circumstances?
On the subject of recruiters there is a range of possibilities.
In most cases they will not be interested in you unless they have
a "job order" for which you could be a candidate. A recruiter
I know who specializes in civil engineers told me he
receives 100 or more unsolicited resumes a week. Most firms
consist of a couple of people with minimum staff support.
Therefore, they rarely have the time to review every resume that
comes across their desk. Furthermore, updating their files can be
very time consuming.
Chances are that you have been contacted by a recruiter in
the past. Why? Recruiters are networking experts. When they
receive a "job order", they contact people who they know
within a particular industry to obtain new leads. If you had
contact with a recruiter in the past, he may have called you
about a particular job he had in mind. If you were not interested,
chances are he asked you if could "suggest" someone he could
contact. This is networking.
Before you begin your job search, you will obviously need
a resume. In addition, you will need to develop letter
writing skills that match your personality and style. The primary
purpose of a networking letter is to convey a message that you
value that person's opinion, and hence perhaps he or she could
assist you as you conduct your job search. Keep in mind that you
are not asking your contact for a job; you are requesting their
help in locating names of individuals or companies which may
have interest in someone with your background.
Who should you choose to write to within a particular firm?
That depends on many factors; the size of the firm , the
"accessibility" of your contact, the nature of their business,
etc. If you feel more comfortable approaching the VP of
Engineering rather than an Engineering Supervisor, write to the
former. Try and contact the person responsible for hiring someone
with your expertise.
Once you have mailed your letter, wait a week or two before
following up. It typically takes a few phone calls to
finally contact the person. It is critical that you do not
give up; the leads that person gives you could be considerable.
The worst that can happen is that the person tells you your
letter was received, but they cannot offer any advice. Thank him
for his time and go on to the next contact. In the event he or
she can suggest leads, make sure you carefully note the
information provided, and act upon the suggestions or leads.
In other words, the process starts over again. Finally, if the
person has been considerate and taken the time to assist
you, I strongly recommend you write and thank them. Not only do
you appreciate their help, you show them what type of person you
are!
As you repeat the networking process over and over again, you
realize several things. To begin with you are progressing in
your job search every day. You are controlling where your
resume is circulated, and you have a "hands-on" approach to
contacting potential employers. Note how this compares to
answering advertisements or using recruiters. Sooner or later you
begin to speak with people who are interested in your
qualifications, and will want to meet with you to discuss
employment.
Networking can be a very rewarding experience and for those who
have found new positions via this technique, no other method
compares. It takes time to develop your letter writing skills, to
feel comfortable telephoning the person you have written, and
following up on the suggestions given. Networking is a full time
job - yet the rewards may very possibly offer more opportunities
than you had at your previous position.
About the author
Paul T. Forde is a graduate engineer with over 15 years industry
experience primarily in the metals related fields. He received
degrees from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) and Columbia
University. His book, EFFECTIVE TECHNICAL NETWORKING, is a step by
step process for conducting an effective job search via the
networking process. It is available from the American Society for
Metals (ASM) at 1 800 336 5152 ext. 900; fax 216 338 4634; e-mail
mem-serv@po.asm-intl.org or directly from the author 401 333 4605;
e-mail LOCHREA@aol.com