Click On Our Sponsors                   

IBN: Defining Excellence in Electronic Recruiting

Electronic Recruiting News

Our Rate Card

Please Click On Our Sponsors

Please Click On Our Sponsors

Recruiting News for the Human Resource Professional

Please Click On Our Sponsors

Please Click On Our Sponsors

Please Click On Our Sponsors

Please Click On Our Sponsors




Click On Our Sponsors

Click On Our Sponsors









The Electronic Recruiting News is a Free Daily Newsletter For Recruiters, HR Managers, Advertising Agencies and Clasified Advertising Operations

Visit our Jobs In Human Resources Management Section.

| Home | ERN | Bugler | The Blogs | Blogroll | Advertise | Archives |Careers |

The Question of Immediately Rehiring

(February 2, 2008) When Peter de Jager wrote this article we were not experiencing routine layoffs. His discussion of possible ways to handle a cut in staff is good. Get your staff together to work as a team and reprioritize the work of the office. It is clear, effective and should be done whether you have a change in staffing or not.
If you walk into your office and an employee hands you their letter of resignation, it's only natural to start thinking of an immediate replacement. This response is usually supported by one, perhaps two, reasons. The most common reason for this reflex thinking is that even though your headcount has decreased, the workload and the associated deadlines are still your responsibility. Replacing the lost employee as quickly as possible is just common sense.

The other reason is a less logical one, and perhaps more difficult to overcome. I've known managers who believe that if they could operate 'effectively' with a reduced headcount for even a short period of time, they could operate with that new headcount forever even though their staff had to make superhuman efforts and unreasonable sacrifices to meet existing deadlines and service levels. With the threat of a permanently reduced headcount dangling over your head, you might think that the faster you replace the departing employee, the better.

Putting this irrational hurdle aside for a moment, is the common-sense approach of immediately filling the open position the best or only possible response to a changed situation?

I had always assumed so, until I was unable to fill an IT position at a retail company for about six months due to the lack of suitable candidates. During that waiting period, some very interesting things happened to my team.

The first thing we did was to prioritize our usual tasks. What did we have to do? What would be nice to do? And what could we stop doing? That last category is sometimes surprisingly large. It's the opposite of the "to do" list, it's the "don't do" list. Somehow, our days get cluttered with trivial tasks that do nothing to move us towards our important goals, the ones we are paid to complete. Unless we do some house cleaning from time to time, the accumulated trivia makes productive work all but impossible.

Once we had agreed on what we could ignore, we focused our attention on what was left, both the work driven by fixed and important deadlines and the stuff that would be nice to accomplish. We also listed new projects we wanted to get going, but had not had a chance to initiate because of the existing workload. In other words, we took the loss of an employee and created the opportunity to re-evaluate everything we were doing; focusing on important tasks and adding new projects we knew would grow our department.

We then took the bold step of disconnecting all our tasks from all staff members and explored what we'd each like to work on. This strategy allowed people to get away from what they found boring or unchallenging and permitted them to attempt tasks, old and new, that they'd never worked on before.

At the end of this shuffling of assignments and several months of monitoring the 'new' team assignments, we had accomplished two important tasks. First, we had revitalized the departmental work experience by introducing a lot of desired change. When we shifted tasks around, team members were given the opportunity to grow into slightly and sometimes completely different positions of responsibility.

Second, we identified department responsibilities we could not deliver because we were lacking in either the resources or expertise. These became the desired skills of the new hire.

The difference with this 'delayed hiring' and the common sense approach of immediately filling the vacant position is best summarized by that last sentence. When we hire immediately, we have a tendency to hire the exact same skill set that we lost. We attempt to 'repair' the hole in our team with a clone of the missing person. Our goal inadvertently becomes "protect the status quo."

By using the person's resignation as a forced opportunity (or excuse, if you prefer) to change our department, we ended up searching for someone with new skills to add to our existing expertise. Our goal became "grow the organization."

There is still, of course, the problem of management and the possibility that they might reduce your headcount while you reshuffle your department. The best solution to that problem is a proactive explanation of what you're attempting to achieve. If they understand what you're trying to accomplish, they might be more willing not to fiddle with your genius. © 2006 Peter de Jager
About Peter de Jager
Peter de Jager is a speaker/writer/consultant on the issues relating to the Rational Assimilation of the Future. He has published hundreds of articles on topics ranging from Problem Solving, Creativity and Change to the impact of technology on areas such as privacy, security and business. His articles have appeared in The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, The Futurist and Scientific American.

Permalink  . -.  Todays Bugler  . -.  Send To a Friend  . -.  Readership Feedback

Quote of the Day

" Sometimes being pushed to the wall gives you the momentum necessary to get over it!"
      - Peter de Jager

HR Jobs

Be sure to visit our Jobs In Human Resources Management Section. Guide to Top Specialty Boards
Where Top Candidates Seek Career Opportunities
Call Center
Drivers / Trucking
Enviro/Occup. Health & Safety
Health / Medical
Hispanic / Bilingual Hispanic Jobs
Security Clearance
Tax Specialists
Telecom / Wireless
For more Specialty Boards, visit:
Employer's Corner on

Enjoy the Bugler and review the latest Recruiting Blogs.

Contacting Us:
Mill Valley, CA 94941

Copyright © 2013 interbiznet. All rights reserved.
Materials written by John Sumser © TwoColorHat. All Rights Reserved.

The Electronic Recruiting News
Sign-up to receive this newsletter in email each day.

Email Address:
Request: Subscribe Unsubscribe

The interbiznet Bugler
Sign up and receive a concise, daily briefing on recruiting industry news.
Email Address:
Request: Subscribe Unsubscribe

ERN | Bugler | Blogs | Blog Roll | Advertise | Archives | About | Contact |

Careers | Candidates | Listings | ToolKit | Companies | Exec Recruiters |

Click On Our Sponsors  






Electronic Recruiting News



    Daily Industry News

  -  ERNIE
    Industry Article




  • Rehiring
  • Comings & Goings
  • Weddle's Awards
  • The Bugler
  • Talent Management Tech
  • Ron Richards
  • Comings & Goings
  • Trend Report
  • First in America to ...
  • Shannon Seery Gude
  • Martin Luther King
  • Coming and Going
  • Employee Turnover Costs
  • Dave Copps
  • Bugler
  • Employed on the Hunt
  • Hiring Older Workers
  • Vanishing Workforce
  • Exiting Aging Workforce
  • McHenry International
  • HR Vital to Strategic Planning
  • EOY - a Good Time to Plan
  • Success: On the Road
  • Cost Cutting Measures
  • Comings & Goings
  • Social Software
  • Bill Vick
  • Work: Best Places
  • Project Management IV
  • Comings & Goings
  • Work?
  • Jim Stroud
  • Corporate Memory
  • Project Management 101
  • Comings & Goings






         © 2013 interbiznet.
         All Rights Reserved.

         Materials written
         by John Sumser
         © TwoColorHat.
         All Rights Reserved.