
Funky Monkeys
(March 06, 2003) --
What could be more frightening than a group of HR folks who think that
they are technologists? Would you let your kids drive across a bridge that they
built? Well, there is a hyperactive collection of monkeys who think of
themselves as 'our' technology enablers. They are called the HR-XML (the sound
you make when clearing your throat) Consortium.
Fresh out of their hands is
a masterpiece of 1984 style computer architecture regarding the standardization
of Background
Checking, Credit Report and Screening Data. Approved at the end of February,
the new standard includes the following language:
Human resources data, by its very nature, is
personal data. The laws of many jurisdictions as well as codes of fair
information practice require organizations to handle personal data in a way
that protects individuals from loss of privacy. The data exchange
specifications developed by the HR-XML Consortium are designed to be useful
across many jurisdictions and within a variety of business contexts. It is not
feasible for the HR-XML Consortium to develop specific privacy guidance for
every jurisdiction or business context in which the Consortium's
specifications might be implemented. When implementing data exchanges using
the HR-XML Consortium's data definitions (or, for that matter, using any other
type of data exchange mechanism), organizations are advised to examine the
privacy protections that may be required under applicable law and codes of
fair information practice. For information on protecting personal data,
general references include: European Union Data Protection Directive
(95/46/EC); the Association Computing Machinery Code of Ethics (1992);
Canadian Standards Association Model Code for the Protection of Personal
Information (1995 – PIPEDA); and U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Principles and FAQs
(2000).
Implementers of the HR-XML Consortium's
Credit Report schema are advised to review applicable law in the jurisdictions
in which they operate. For example, in United States, the Fair Credit
Reporting Act may require third-party providers of background-check services
to obtain the consent of search subjects and to advise them of results before
adverse action is taken.
Of course the assembled
masses of vendors and a few HR Departments (about 1% of the membership) can
get away with this foolishness. The HR-XML Consortium is a non-accountable
feeding frenzy of vendors cutting each other slap-on-the-back deals. The
Background checking spec was written by, you guessed it, Background Checking
vendors. No candidate input, no regulatory input and above all, no HR input.
That way, when the liability issues rear their heads, they can say "Hey we
only were in it for the technology." Then they get to bill for the
customization associated with a spec that is supposed to remove the need for
customization.
That kind of foolishness can be overlooked when
it involves meaningless data. In this case, however, the privacy issues are
extreme. Without guidance and under the cover of the darkness of ignorance,
these clowns are assembling a data tool of Orwellian proportions and shrugging
their shoulders about the implications.
If you work for a vendor on the list or have an
account with them, inquire strongly about the exposure to privacy liability that
they are creating. Have them tell you why they are building a system that puts
you at risk.
- John Sumser
"Niche Job
Sites are more effective" - Forrester Research
study
Tired of getting 'Quantity' when all you really want is Quality?
Use these top Niche Job Sites and get results:
For Special Niche Site
Promotions click here