
Branding IV
(December 20, 2002) - Maybe
it's not a surprise that the military is so far ahead of the curve. Military
organizations have pioneered recruitment methods for thousands of years. From
the good old fashioned 'shanghai'
(kidnapping) to forced conscription, from promises of royalty (knighthood) to a
share of the plunder, from educational benefits (the GI Bill) to full retirement
pay after 20 years, the military has repeatedly set the standard and defined the
methods for recruiting.
Faced with a much more difficult challenge than
commercial or government recruiting, it makes sense that the military is the
standard setter for techniques, planning and execution. These days, the American
Military, with generations of success staffing an all-volunteer service, is
branching out into branding as a central thesis of membership. According to
Forbes, the
military is using 'brand power' to name, manage and build loyalty.
Remember the "be all that you can be"
campaign for Army recruiting in the early 1980s? It may well be the first
example of an employment branding campaign. The simple phrase accomplished the particularly
tricky tactic we described in yesterday's article. The phrase is far more
about the potential recruit than it is about the Army. As with websites, brands
are about the customer first and the company second.
Today's Army Recruitment campaign is sloganed
"an army of one". If you perused last
week's material on GenY, you'll have a clear picture of this demographic
targeting. Appealing to GenY's branding habits and simultaneous desire for
autonomy is at the root of the brilliant new messaging. The military is also
recognizing that the contemporary battlefield requires independent thought and
that may well be reflected in the relaxation of uniform dress at the front
lines.
From workforce planning and training requirements
development, from loyalty programs to retention strategies, the amazing fact is
that this behemoth of an organization is forced, by its all volunteer mandate,
to be extremely market-effective. If you are looking for help in turning your
company's approach to HR around by focusing on investment and results, you could
do worse than to hire an expert from the military.
The dramatic focus of the military's recruitment
and retention machine is made possible by its focus on specific demographic
targets. The problem is somewhat more complex for the rest of us. Age
requirements for membership in our organizations would bring with them tidy
little payments to class-action lawyers. We have to, for good reason, focus on
demographics beyond age. But, the truth is that our real demographic
opportunities, though not as glamorous as an obsessive focus on a single
generational slice are relatively clear. We recruit from the local geography.
Our competitors for talent are observable and local.
While the military does indeed set a repeatable
standard, the work of bringing that level of excellence into our work requires
that we tailor it to the local circumstances. Our brands do not have to reach an
entire generation. They have to reach enough people to fuel our continued growth
and meet our individual workforce requirements.
- John
Sumser