
Things Have Changed
(November 20, 2002) -
No one has really figured out how to quantify
the changes wrought by the introduction of the Internet to the desktop over the
past decade. Most of the institutions that were around in the pre-internet days
seem to have survived the massive introduction of new technologies and ideas.
With little in the way of institutional assessment tools, however, it can be
hard to tell what's what.
Is SHRM stronger or weaker as a result of the
change? Well, we know that the organization failed to meet the needs of an
entire generation of new HR professionals by missing out on the opportunity to
lead the way into the Internet era. But, did it damage the organization's
overall strength?
Alexa (have
you installed the toolbar
yet?) has added even more interesting functionality to its offering. Traffic
details (here
are ours) now include estimates of reach per million users and a reach
ranking as well as a page views per user count and a total page views ranking.
In addition, it is now possible to compare the overall ranking performance of
one site against another. (This graph
comparing the Lockheed and Northrop-Grumman websites might suggest which
company is using the web more effectively!)
Although anyone can see that online advertising
has decimated the newspaper's classified ad business, this
chart shows why Monster is so broadly perceived to be a problem for
CareerBuilder. While the question of whether anyone needs a consolidated
national site remains open, the two firms compete for the business. Monster's
reach, at 4.3% of Internet users is nearly 3 times Careerbuilder's reach of
1.7%.
The usual
caveats apply to Alexa rankings. They're simply the only easy access
measurement device around. We'd recommend that you compare a number of sites and
get used to using the comparison tool (it's right under the traffic graph in the
traffic details page on Alexa). For the time being, it is the best way to assess
overall web performance of a vendor.
From here, it looks like SHRM lost ground with
the introduction of the net. Their typical audience is only a little more than
50% larger than ours. We're certain that all of their massive membership is
online but they'd need to be reaching an audience four or five times its current
size. We think that lots of little operations have replaced them.
-John
Sumser