
Sow's Ear
(August 21, 2002) -
Any regular reader will know that we are not members of the Brass Ring fan
club. The excesses of the firm, internally and externally, have left us in the
position of pointing to them as a classic example of how the newspapers are
mismanaging their efforts to defend their business. We've often used the firm as
an opportunity to exercise our sarcasm muscles.
Plagued by the inability to stabilize their new
software release, void of leadership and consumed with internal politics, the
firm has managed to take a dozen viable businesses and turn them into a single
swamp. Significant attrition problems in critical account and product management
roles have left customers to fend for themselves against a failing software
development operation that has no embedded recruiting expertise.
We recall with fondness our experiences years
ago with the entrepreneurs whose companies were ultimately merged to become this
shrinking, directionless enterprise. Each of the teams had a remarkable grasp of
the dynamics of their niche and provided powerful value to their customers. We
met them in their offices, in our offices and on the road.
One of the central features of newspaper
management is the degree to which everything becomes politicized. Although all
organizations need a political infrastructure, the older and more successful a
firm becomes, the more likely it is to have politics as the dominant
consideration in its decision making. We're not even saying that its an
inherently bad thing. Political organizations focus on the distribution of the
existing pie while entrepreneurial shops focus on making the pie. While the
newspapers themselves have the luxury of focusing on politics, their markets
must be defended by entities that focus on customers.
Not all newspaper spawned operations are
inherently failures. Tony Lee, at CareerJournal, is single handedly
demonstrating the national path. Bob Cauthorn, at the SFGate, is handily
addressing the real sales question for local employment advertising. The Hearst
company is regularly experimenting with interesting approaches. Even
CareerBuilder is exploring new turf with its attempts to integrate national and
local reach.
BrassRing, on the other hand, has managed to
emulate a 'black hole'. Everything it touches gets smaller. It reminds us of the
old dot com joke "If you want to make a small fortune on the Internet,
start with a large one." First it was a software company, then it was a job
board, then it was a service company then it was a software company again. Like
many mergers, the whole was far less than the sum of the parts. Political
considerations outweighed customer concerns as the company tried to turn
advertising businesses into software firms.
Recently, the firm simultaneously announced
layoffs, restructuring and a new focus. With fewer than 300 survivors (and
still not a shred of recruiting expertise), the company has committed to become
a Recruitment outsourcer. Pity the poor customers who are trying to get their
current software installations to work. Somehow, dramatic staff reductions and
the loss (to competitors) of key account people coupled with the layoff-driven
replacement of the key software executive has positioned the firm to march into
a new direction.
Although BrassRing is hardly alone in their
inability to manage software development and customer satisfaction (Recruitsoft
appears to be setting the standards in that arena), the failure to deliver the
very thing that the CEO is an expert in leaves little to expect from the firm's
reincarnation as an outsourcer. You can imagine the meeting: "Now that
we've screwed up those Recruiting businesses, let's do it for other
people."
The real irony is that this is the direction that
the newspapers should be taking. Pay for performance employment advertising is
recruiting. In the long haul, the newspapers will realize this and make it
central to their survival. The BrassRing team, however, is the wrong place to
start.
-John
Sumser