interbiznet: The Recruiting News

The Recruiting News













Please Click On Our Sponsors


Please Click On Our Sponsors


Recruiting News for the Human Resource Professional


Please Click On Our Sponsors


Please Click On Our Sponsors



Please Click On Our Sponsors


Please Click On Our Sponsors




 

 

 

Click On Our Sponsors



Click On Our Sponsors





 

 

 

 



New
interbiznet
Bookclub

interbiznet
Listings

Find out more
About IBN

Got a news tip?
Tell us at
bugler@
interbiznet.com


Our Rate Card

Articles

Presentations

Trends Reports

Archives


Suggestions?



It is better
to not be on
the web than
to be on and
not know why

John Sumser

Reality
is more
complex
than
it seems.
John Gall






OUR HOME

The Electronic Recruiting News is a Free Daily Newsletter For Recruiters, HR Managers, Advertising Agencies and Clasified Advertising Operations


Home | ERN | Bugler | The Blogs | Blogroll | Advertise | Archives | Careers

Promotivator

(October 20, 2000) We're suckers for old timey gimmicks. We always try to remember that the roots of marketing involve a gaudy sign with large red letters reading "SALE". Simple is good. Simpler is better (but probably too expensive.) That's probably why we like the pro-motivator so much.

At its simplest, the Promotivator is a desktop based application that offers weekly motivational tips for web promoters. In addition, the tool offers access to a web based forum on the subject and daily steps a successful web promoter might take.

Like a pet rock, it just sits there.

This down market use of streaming news delivery offers an interesting possible model for long term recruiting in tightly defined professional niches. Take a look at ProMotivator and then imagine a similar tip of the day / discussion forum for engineering specialties, sales pros, doctors, printers, customer service people or whatever specialty you are trying to recruit.

Our guess is that the total overhead for running a similar-to operation would be in the range of $50K to $75K/year. To be effective, the operation couldn't holler about jobs. Rather, imagine it as an indispensable desktop success aid delivered in exchange for detailed demographics and work history. Over time, a relationship with 25,000 potential candidates would be a bargain at those annual rates.

- John Sumser © TwoColorHat. All Rights Reserved.

******************************************************************************************
Discover fresh ideas and new strategies
at Kennedy Information's:


e-Recruiting and Staffing Conference and Expo
November 16-17, New York City

Don't miss the premier e-Recruiting event!

******************************************************************************************


Faster Good, Right Hire Better

(October 19, 2000) What's with all of the emphasis on efficiency. Saving time and money are only interesting if the quality variable is constantly addressed. The argument goes something like this:
All employees contribute to a company's revenue generation to one degree or another. Every open position at a company has an opportunity cost associated with it - if the job is not filled, revenue associated with the job is not generated. Traditional recruiting methods can take as much as 53 days, on average, to fill an open position. In highly skilled labor markets, that translates into more than $62,000 in opportunity costs for each open position. That amounts to $1,173 per day that a trained, motivated employee would be contributing to an organization's bottom line.

From the MobileRecruiter Website

By the same token, a staffing decision made too quickly without enough data, can cost many times more than $62,000. Patterned mistakes, bad cultural fit, inadequate background checking or pure incompetence can multiply the cost of a bad hire through the ceiling.

We say that the critical factor to consider is effectiveness, not efficiency. In other words, time to hire or cost to hire are completely irrelevant unless there is an equal measure of quality of hire. Faster and cheaper are not better in and of themselves. Just as volume isn't the answer, cost and speed are also incidentals.

- John Sumser © TwoColorHat. All Rights Reserved.


Hidden Costs


(October 18, 2000) Why are the "job board in a box" companies (Hire.com, Joboo, Boxwood and so on) having such trouble with market traction? The core idea is right: the best recruiting website is your own home page. What's going on, then?

It turns out that most companies (except the top 200 brands) don't have large enough web audiences to make the leasing of a home page function useful. What most purchasers discover is that a really solid employment offering points out the weaknesses in overall traffic development. When you begin using one of them, you are immediately confronted with the weaknesses in your web traffic.

As we saw in yesterday's note, traffic, in a permanent labor shortage, requires constant investment in value for the job hunting and career minded traffic. For the most part, the aforementioned services don't offer a meaningful solution to the traffic problem. In effect, they become the measurement of the problem.

Part of the problem is that really meaningful traffic development is really expensive and requires very careful planning. Given that a candidate is really worth 30% of the first year's salary and given that you need at least a hundred resumes that are close, a very high traffic development budget might be in the neighborhood of .3% of a year's salary ($100/visitor on a $30K job). At the other extreme, some points based programs get the costs down to around a dollar (though they aren't very targeted).

It's beginning to look like web traffic development costs spread on a "bathtub curve" with both low and high quality traffic being the most expensive. For instance, a loyalty program like Cybergold, while useful for developing visitors for a huge candidate pool like Headhunter, is, in the end, very expensive for a single company. Although eyeballs can be purchased for $1 a set (over time), the recruiting website is forced to discern professions from groups who are targeted along leisure interest lines. The traffic fit just isn't always there. Loyalty programs can produce high volumes of low quality traffic.

At the other extreme, visitor acquisition priced at search firm levels begs the "why bother" question.

The market's silly emphasis on Internet Recruiting as a cheap alternative to newspaper advertising makes the real traffic development numbers hard to stomach. Those numbers look like the cost of running a search firm (20% of the first year's salary). We've said many harsh things about the search industry over the years. Never once have we said anything other than "there is a direct correlation between the prices they charge and the value they deliver". Unfortunately, the cost of acquiring candidates is rapidly exceeding their reach.

In summary, the job board in a box offerings are slow to take off because they confront customers with a harsh reality and no solution. In a permanent labor shortage, anyone who promises cheaper is smoking pot. The solution involves owning up to the harsh new reality and delivering the right product.

- John Sumser © TwoColorHat. All Rights Reserved.


Paying Candidates


(October 17, 2000) It's here and we like it. Headhunter.net is offering incentives to candidates for disclosing information about themselves, reading job ads and pawing through email related to their interests. In a partnership with MyPoints.com, Headhunter offers careerists the opportunity to accumulate something like frequent flyer miles. Awards can be earned for use at Hilton, Barnes and Noble, Macy's, Sprint, Red Lobster and a stack of others.

MyPoints.com is one of a number of services that provide a vehicle for maintaining web visitor loyalty and expanding on it. (BTW, the others include Cybergold, clickRewards, Netcentives, RewardsPrograms and ecentives). These companies allow their customers and alliance partners to incent visitors for more information, measurable behavior or repeat visits. With the mypoints program in place, Headhunter now has a way to build loyalty and pay its users for their time.

When labor is scarce, you have to pay it for its time.

The program was so obvious that we should have been able to see it coming. That's why we think it's an absolutely brilliant move. Our hats are off to the folks at headhunter for being the first to figure out how (and why) to pay candidates.

It's just the beginning!

- John Sumser © TwoColorHat. All Rights Reserved.


Foundations Of an SBB (Part 3)


(October 16, 2000) We're starting to have an interesting package of the characteristics of an SBB (single belly button) vendor in the E-Recruiting space:
  • Objectivity
  • Ability to Measure Job Board Performance
  • Simple Decision Making Design
  • Ability to Help Customers Spend (and choose) Effectively
  • Dynamic Measurement of Job Board Performance
  • Interface with Major Applicant Tracking Systems
  • One Step Posting To Major Outlets
  • Data Consolidation (resume standardization)
  • Website Hosting
  • Website Traffic Development
This is enough to justify thinking of a player as a potential SBB. It isn't, however, enough to provide single point accountability in the relationship. Additional things an SBB ought to provide include:
  • Recommendations For Applicant Tracking, Workflow and Enterprise Installations
  • Copy Editing and Improvement
  • Brand Development Assistance
  • Systems Integration Assistance
  • Print Campaign Integration
  • Gateway Services:
    • Assessment
    • Background Checking and Screening
    • Constant Development of New Sources
    • Performance Prediction and Fine Tuning by Source
  • Staffing Audits and Improvement Techniques
  • Staffing Source Selection
  • Unified Billing (Single Invoice)
  • Integrated Data Management (from all sources to customer system)
The list makes it clear that most of the current infrastructure players and wannabe's have a long way to go. While an enterprise software provider could, in theory, execute most of these systems, we're more likely to think that the channel marketers of enterprise players are in a better position to deliver real service.

In case we haven't been clear enough, objectivity and a total emphasis on customer effectiveness are at the heart of the SBB play.

- John Sumser © TwoColorHat. All Rights Reserved.


Home | ERN | Bugler | The Blogs | Blogroll | Advertise | Archives | Careers

Contacting Us:
Call, fax, write, email. We'd love to talk about your project.

All material on this site is © 1995 - 2010 by IBN: interbiznet.com
(The Internet Business Network), PO Box 2474, Mill Valley, CA 94941
415.377.2255
colleen@interbiznet.com

To Subscribe or Unsubscribe From the ERNIE...
Enter email:
Enter name:
Subscribe Unsubscribe
interbiznet this week
(through October 20, 2000)

1st Steps In The Job Hunt
    - Video Dating Services
    - Icons
    - Cover Letter Charts
    - Fear of Success
    - The Write Job
 

     FEATURES:

  • interbiznet Bookclub
  • interbiznet Listings
  • interbiznet Trends
  • EMAIL NEWSLETTERS:
         - Bugler
           (Sign-up)
           Daily Industry News

         - ERNIE
           (Sign-up)
           ERN in Email

         ANNUAL REPORTS:      

  • Electronic Recruiting
         Index (ERI)
         - 2002 ERI
         - 2001 ERI
         - 2000 ERI
         - 1999 ERI
         - 1997 ERI
         - 1996 ERI
         - Report Pricing

         RESOURCES:

  • Integrated Employment
          Branding Presentation
  • 2003 Trends Whitepaper
  • interbiznet Listings
  • interbiznet Trends
  • interbiznet Bookclub
  • Top 100 E-Recruiters
  • Presentations
         - Recruiting Then/Now
  • Recruiter's Toolkit
  • Seminar In A Box
  • ERN Archives
  • 1st Steps In The Hunt

         ADVERTISING:

  • Our Rate Card
  • Demographics


    Last Week's ERN

    October 15, 2000
  • Foundations Of an SBB (Part 2)
  • Foundations Of an SBB (Part 1)
  • Single Belly Button
  • When Recruiting Becomes Advertising
  • ERNIE

    ERN Archives


    Past Issues
    About interbiznet
    interbiznet publications

    Stocks We Watch
    Public Companies in
    Electronic Recruiting

    AOL
    CareerBldr
    CareerEngine
    CBS
    Central Newspapers
    CMGI
    Dow Jones
    Excite
    E-cruiter
    General Electric
    Headhunter.net

    IDG
    Inktomi
    Knight Ridder
    Microsoft
    New York Times
    Omnicom
    Oracle
    Penton
    PeopleSoft
    Restrac (Web Hire)
    SAP
    Student Advantage
    TMP
    Top Jobs On The Net
    Tribune
    US Search Co
    VerticalNet
    Washington Post
    Yahoo
    ZDNet


    Pending IPOs

    - None


    Public Staffing Cos

    ACSYS
    Adecco
    AHL Services
    Alternative Resources
    American Consolidated
    Analysts Int'l
    Barrett
    Butler
    Career Horizons
    CDI
    Co-Counsel
    Comforce
    Computer Horizons
    Computer Task Grp
    Consolidated Tech Grp
    Data Processing Resources
    Employee Solutions
    General Employment
    GTS Duratek
    Hall Kinion
    Headway
    Heidrick
    Heist
    Interim
    IT Staffing
    Joule
    Keane
    Kelly Services
    Kforce
    Korn-Ferry
    Manpower
    National Technical
    National TechTeam
    Norrell
    Olsten
    On Assignment
    Outsource Int'l
    PGA
    Registry
    Remedy
    Right Management
    Robert Half
    Solomon-Page
    SOS Staffing
    Staff Builders
    Syntel
    TechniSource
    Volt
    Watsco
    Western Staff
    Winston Resources
    Work Int'l